Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-11-09

CORP. MITHILESH KUMAR @MITHILESH SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA .

Citation / case number
SC 2009/379
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CORP. MITHILESH KUMAR @MITHILESH SINGH
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA .
Author
DALVEER BHANDARI,DEEPAK VERMA, , ,
Bench
DALVEER BHANDARI,DEEPAK VERMA, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's judgment, affirming that an acquittal does not automatically entitle an employee to back wages following dismissal due to a conviction under Section 302 IPC. The Court referenced the principles established in Ranchhodji Chaturji Thakore Vs. Superintendent Engineer and Union of India & Ors. Vs. Jaipal Singh, emphasizing that reinstatement is warranted post-acquittal, but back wages depend on the legality of prior disciplinary actions. The appeals were dismissed as lacking merit, with costs borne by the parties.

CORP. MITHILESH KUMAR @MITHILESH SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA . · Niyam