Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-11-11

S.D.JOSHI vs HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY &ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 2008/32137
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S.D.JOSHI
Respondent
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY &ORS.
Author
Swatanter Kumar
Bench
SWATANTER KUMAR,CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of 'judicial office' under Article 217(2)(a) of the Constitution, determining that Family Court Judges, who perform judicial functions and are appointed under statutory rules, qualify as holding a judicial office. The Court held that Family Court Judges are eligible for elevation to the High Court, affirming their parity with judges of other courts. This decision clarifies the status of Family Court Judges within the judicial hierarchy and their rights to career advancement under Article 217.

S.D.JOSHI vs HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY &ORS. · Niyam