Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-11-11

S.D.Joshi & Ors vs High Court Of Judicature At Bombay &Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 848
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S.D.Joshi & Ors
Respondent
High Court Of Judicature At Bombay &Ors
Author
Swatanter Kumar
Bench
Chandramauli Kumar Prasad, Swatanter Kumar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of 'judicial office' under Article 217(2)(a) of the Constitution, determining that Family Court Judges do indeed hold a judicial office and are eligible for elevation to the High Court. The Court emphasized that Family Court Judges perform judicial functions akin to those of City Civil Court Judges, as established under the Family Courts Act, 1984, particularly Sections 4 and 19. Consequently, the Court held that Family Court Judges should be considered for appointment as High Court Judges, affirming their status within the judicial hierarchy.

S.D.Joshi & Ors vs High Court Of Judicature At Bombay &Ors · Niyam