Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-11-19

State Of U.P. & Ors vs Dhiraj Singh

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of U.P. & Ors
Respondent
Dhiraj Singh
Bench
A.K. Patnaik, R.V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court clarified that the quashing of the termination of service does not entitle the employee to back wages, but only to reinstatement and continuity in service for the purpose of retiral benefits. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the termination order, emphasizing that the respondent's retirement means he is entitled to continuity in service without any claim for back wages. The appeal by the State of Uttar Pradesh was disposed of accordingly.

State Of U.P. & Ors vs Dhiraj Singh · Niyam