Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-11-26

Cen.Pub.Information Officer,Sci & Anr vs Subhash Chandra Agarwal

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Cen.Pub.Information Officer,Sci & Anr
Respondent
Subhash Chandra Agarwal
Author
B. Sudershan Reddy
Bench
Surinder Singh Nijjar, B. Sudershan Reddy

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal against the Central Information Commission's order directing the Supreme Court's CPIO to provide information regarding the appointment of judges, specifically referencing the Right to Information Act, 2005, particularly Section 19. The Court emphasized the need to protect the judiciary from unnecessary public scrutiny and intrusion, citing the public interest in maintaining the confidentiality of judicial appointments as established in S.P. Gupta v. Union of India. The Court ultimately held that the information sought should not be disclosed, reinforcing the principle that judicial appointments should remain insulated from external pressures.

Cen.Pub.Information Officer,Sci & Anr vs Subhash Chandra Agarwal · Niyam