Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-11-11

S.D.Joshi & Ors vs High Court Of Judicature At Bombay ...

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S.D.Joshi & Ors
Respondent
High Court Of Judicature At Bombay ...
Author
Swatanter Kumar
Bench
Chandramauli Kumar Prasad, Swatanter Kumar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the definition of 'judicial office' under Article 217(2)(a) of the Constitution, determining that Family Court Judges, who perform judicial functions and are appointed under the Family Courts Act, 1984, do indeed hold a 'judicial office'. The Court held that such judges are eligible for elevation to the High Court, affirming their parity with judges of other courts. This decision clarifies the status of Family Court Judges in the context of judicial appointments and their rights under Article 217.

S.D.Joshi & Ors vs High Court Of Judicature At Bombay ... · Niyam