Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-11-29

M/S. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd vs Commnr. Of Central Excise, Mumbai

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd
Respondent
Commnr. Of Central Excise, Mumbai
Author
Mukundakam Sharma
Bench
Anil R. Dave, Mukundakam Sharma

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of excisability of 'Vitamin A Acetate Crude' and 'Vitamin A Palmitate' under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court upheld the Tribunal's finding that these products are marketable and thus liable to excise duty, emphasizing that commercial marketability is not negated by instability at room temperature or lack of standard specifications. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the duty liability on the appellant for the specified period.

M/S. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd vs Commnr. Of Central Excise, Mumbai · Niyam