Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-05-04

BHANUMATI ETC. ETC. vs STATE OF U.P.TR.PRINL.SEC..

Citation / case number
SC 2009/4241
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BHANUMATI ETC. ETC.
Respondent
STATE OF U.P.TR.PRINL.SEC..
Author
G.S. SINGHVI,ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, , ,
Bench
G.S. SINGHVI,ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the U.P. Panchayat Laws (Amendment) Act, 2007, affirming that the amendments made by Section 2 and Section 9, which omitted the offices of 'Up-Pramukh', 'Senior Up-Pramukh', 'Junior Up-Pramukh', and 'Upadhyaksha', do not violate the principles enshrined in Part IX of the Constitution. The Court reasoned that the amendments do not erode the essence of Panchayati Raj principles nor invite executive interference, thus maintaining the integrity of local self-governance. The appeals challenging the amendments were dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision.

BHANUMATI ETC. ETC. vs STATE OF U.P.TR.PRINL.SEC.. · Niyam