Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-05-03

M/S. M.R.F. LTD. vs MANOHAR PARRIKAR .

Citation / case number
SC 2001/9821
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. M.R.F. LTD.
Respondent
MANOHAR PARRIKAR .
Author
R.V. RAVEENDRAN,H.L. DATTU, , ,
Bench
R.V. RAVEENDRAN,H.L. DATTU, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the legality of notifications issued by the Government of Goa under Section 23 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, which granted a 25% rebate to industrial consumers. The Court held that the rescission of the rebate notification was valid under Section 21 of the General Clauses Act and Sections 23 and 51-A of the Electricity Act, affirming the High Court's decision. The judgment clarified the procedural requirements under Article 166 of the Constitution for issuing such notifications.

M/S. M.R.F. LTD. vs MANOHAR PARRIKAR . · Niyam