Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-05-04

Bhanumati Etc. Etc vs State Of U.P.Tr.Prinl.Sec.& Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2010 SUPREME COURT 3796
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Bhanumati Etc. Etc
Respondent
State Of U.P.Tr.Prinl.Sec.& Ors
Bench
Asok Kumar Ganguly, G.S. Singhvi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the U.P. Panchayat Laws (Amendment) Act, 2007, affirming that the amendments made by Sections 2 and 9, which omitted the offices of 'Up-Pradhan', 'Up-Pramukh', and related positions, do not violate the principles enshrined in Part IX of the Constitution. The Court found that the amendments do not constitute executive interference nor erode the essence of Panchayati Raj principles, thus rejecting the challenges against the amendments. The judgment reinforces the legislative power to amend local governance structures under the 1961 Act and the 1947 Act without contravening constitutional mandates.

Bhanumati Etc. Etc vs State Of U.P.Tr.Prinl.Sec.& Ors · Niyam