Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-05-07

Anil Kumar vs B.S. Neelkanta & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2010 SUPREME COURT 2715
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Anil Kumar
Respondent
B.S. Neelkanta & Ors
Author
D.K. Jain
Bench
D.K. Jain

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed a petition under Sections 11(5) and 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, concerning the appointment of an arbitrator due to disputes arising from a lease agreement between the Andhra Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation and Goldstone Engineering Ltd. The Court emphasized the necessity of adhering to the lease's non-assignability clause, which required prior consent from the Corporation for any change in shareholding. The Court held that the agreements made without such consent were in breach of the lease terms, thereby justifying the Corporation's actions.

Anil Kumar vs B.S. Neelkanta & Ors · Niyam