Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-05-05

Selvi & Ors vs State Of Karnataka & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2010 SUPREME COURT 1974
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Selvi & Ors
Respondent
State Of Karnataka & Anr
Author
K.G. Balakrishnan
Bench
J.M. Panchal, R.V. Raveendran, K.G. Balakrishnan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of involuntary scientific techniques such as narcoanalysis, polygraph tests, and BEAP tests in criminal investigations, emphasizing the conflict between effective investigation and individual rights. The Court held that the right against self-incrimination under Article 20(3) extends to testimonial evidence, and thus, the results of these tests cannot be used as evidence in court. The judgment underscored the necessity of consent for such tests and affirmed the protection of personal liberty under Article 21, ultimately ruling against the involuntary use of these techniques without consent.

Selvi & Ors vs State Of Karnataka & Anr · Niyam