Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-03-18

SAMPATI GOVIND BHIL.(D) TR.HIS LRS. vs SUDAM BAPU WARIK

Citation / case number
SC 2006/30420
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SAMPATI GOVIND BHIL.(D) TR.HIS LRS.
Respondent
SUDAM BAPU WARIK
Author
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA,H.L. DATTU, , ,
Bench
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA,H.L. DATTU, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the applicability of Section 32F(1A) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, emphasizing that a tenant must provide notice of intention to purchase the land they occupy. The Court clarified that the provisions of Section 32F are independent of Section 31, establishing that failure to comply with Section 32F(1A) results in the tenant not exercising their right to purchase. The appeal against the Bombay High Court's dismissal of the writ petition was dismissed, affirming the mandatory nature of the notice requirement.

SAMPATI GOVIND BHIL.(D) TR.HIS LRS. vs SUDAM BAPU WARIK · Niyam