M/S.BHANWARLAL DUGAR vs BRIDHICHAND PANNALAL .

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in reversing the concurrent findings of fact by the Trial Court and Appellate Court regarding the landlord's bona fide requirement of the commercial premises and the tenant's wilful default in rent payment. The Court emphasized that under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the High Court should not interfere with concurrent findings unless there is a manifest error. The appeal was allowed, reinstating the eviction order against the tenant.