Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-07-06

C.I.T.,MUMBAI vs M/S.WALFORT SHARE & STOCK BROKERS P.LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2009/10694
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
C.I.T.,MUMBAI
Respondent
M/S.WALFORT SHARE & STOCK BROKERS P.LTD.
Author
S.H. KAPADIA,SWATANTER KUMAR, , ,
Bench
S.H. KAPADIA,SWATANTER KUMAR, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether losses from dividend stripping transactions prior to 1.4.2002 could be disallowed as artificial losses under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that such transactions, primarily aimed at tax avoidance, do not constitute genuine business transactions, and thus, the loss claimed by the assessee was disallowed. The Court upheld the assessment order which disallowed the loss of Rs. 1,82,12,862.80, confirming that the dividend income was exempt under Section 10(33) but the associated loss was not permissible for set-off.

C.I.T.,MUMBAI vs M/S.WALFORT SHARE & STOCK BROKERS P.LTD. · Niyam