Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-07-06

COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI vs M/S. PEARL DRINKS LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2003/2286
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI
Respondent
M/S. PEARL DRINKS LTD.
Author
T.S. THAKUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals under Section 35(L)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, concerning the dismissal of a Revenue appeal by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal based on the principle of merger. The Tribunal determined that the earlier order of the Commissioner of Central Excise had merged with a prior decision, despite the appeal being limited to two of eight disputed deductions. The Court upheld the Tribunal's ruling, affirming the principle of merger in excise matters and the legitimacy of the deductions claimed under Section 4 of the Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944.

COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI vs M/S. PEARL DRINKS LTD. · Niyam