Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-07-26

United Bank Of India vs Satyawati Tondon & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2010 SUPREME COURT 3413
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
United Bank Of India
Respondent
Satyawati Tondon & Ors
Bench
Asok Kumar Ganguly, G.S. Singhvi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (DRT Act), emphasizing its purpose to expedite the recovery of dues owed to banks and financial institutions. The Court noted that the DRT Act establishes specialized tribunals with summary procedures, thereby barring the jurisdiction of Civil Courts as per Section 17 of the Act. The judgment reinforced the need for a swift legal mechanism to address the backlog of cases involving financial recovery, ensuring that public funds are not trapped in unproductive ventures.

United Bank Of India vs Satyawati Tondon & Ors · Niyam