Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-07-28

Mithu Kalita vs State Of Assam

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Mithu Kalita
Respondent
State Of Assam
Bench
C.K. Prasad, Harjit Singh Bedi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellants under Sections 302/34 and 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code, affirming the High Court's decision that the evidence presented by the prosecution, particularly from eyewitnesses P.W.1 Rameshwar and P.W.6 Madan Lal, was sufficient to establish the guilt of the appellants despite some contradictions. The Court noted that the trial court's initial acquittal was based on the unreliability of witness testimony, but the High Court found that the cumulative evidence supported the conviction. The Court emphasized the importance of corroborative evidence in establishing the facts of the case, leading to the conclusion that the appellants were guilty of homicide and assault.

Mithu Kalita vs State Of Assam · Niyam