Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-07-05

Avinash Gaikwad & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Avinash Gaikwad & Ors
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra & Ors
Author
R.V.Raveendran
Bench
P Sathasivam, R V Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Bombay High Court dismissing W.P.No.649/2005, affirming the validity of the no objection certificate (NOC) granted by MHADA for redevelopment under Regulation No. 33(7) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai, 1991. The Court emphasized that the redevelopment scheme, which allows for the construction of additional tenements and free sale flats, is in accordance with the Urban Renewal Scheme and addresses the financial constraints faced by MHADA. The Court held that the proposal by the Pimpalwadi Bhadekaru Sangh and the subsequent actions by MHADA and the State Government were legally sound and in the public interest.

Avinash Gaikwad & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors · Niyam