Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-01-22

SATYANARAYAN SULTANIA & ANR. vs STATE OF CHHATISGARH

Citation / case number
SC 2008/64226
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SATYANARAYAN SULTANIA & ANR.
Respondent
STATE OF CHHATISGARH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition challenging the Chhattisgarh High Court's order which upheld the confiscation of paddy under the Madhya Pradesh Essential Commodities (Exhibition of Price and Price Control) Order, 1997. The Court held that the definition of 'dealer' under the Control Order and the Licensing Order was correctly applied, affirming that the petitioners were not exempt from the provisions of the law. The Court found no illegality in the confiscation proceedings initiated by the authorities, thus upholding the lower court's decisions.

SATYANARAYAN SULTANIA & ANR. vs STATE OF CHHATISGARH · Niyam