ABDUL RAZAK (D) THR.LRS. vs MANGESH RAJARAM WAGLE .

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Bombay High Court allowing the writ petition of respondent Nos. 1 and 2, which sought to strike off the additional written statement filed by the appellants after their impleadment as legal representatives of deceased defendant No. 2, Abdul Razak. The Court emphasized that the trial court's decision to allow the impleadment was justified, as it was necessary for the effective adjudication of the tenancy dispute under the Goa, Daman and Diu (Control of Rent, Eviction) Act, 1968. The Court held that the appellants' objections regarding the impleadment were without merit, affirming the High Court's order.