Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-01-06

HARINARAYAN G BAJAJ vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .

Citation / case number
SC 2008/24597
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HARINARAYAN G BAJAJ
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .
Author
V.S. SIRPURKAR
Bench
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA V.S. SIRPURKAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, particularly Sub-Section (4), regarding the addition of a co-accused during ongoing proceedings. The Court held that the Trial Court has the authority to summon additional accused if there is sufficient evidence against them, emphasizing the need for a fair trial and the rights of the complainant. The Court upheld the decision of the High Court to allow the addition of the fifth respondent as a co-accused, reinforcing the principle that justice must not be denied due to procedural delays.

HARINARAYAN G BAJAJ vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . · Niyam