UTTARANCHAL PEY JAL S.V.A.N.NIGAM vs ARVIND GARG

The Supreme Court addressed multiple civil appeals concerning the interpretation of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, emphasizing that the scope of judicial intervention in arbitration proceedings is limited. The Court held that the appointment of an arbitrator should not be interfered with unless there are compelling reasons, thereby reinforcing the principle of minimal judicial interference in arbitration matters. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the lower court's decisions regarding the arbitration process.