Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-01-28

MUSHEER KHAN @ BADSHAH KHAN vs STATE OF M.P.

Citation / case number
SC 2004/28168
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MUSHEER KHAN @ BADSHAH KHAN
Respondent
STATE OF M.P.
Author
GANGULY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the case of circumstantial evidence in a murder trial, emphasizing that the prosecution must establish a clear chain of events linking the accused to the crime. The Court highlighted the importance of eyewitness testimonies, particularly from PW-3 and PW-4, in corroborating the prosecution's narrative. The judgment underscored that the absence of direct evidence necessitates a meticulous examination of circumstantial evidence to ensure that it leads to only one conclusion: the guilt of the accused under Section 302 IPC. The Court ultimately upheld the conviction of the accused based on the established circumstantial evidence.

MUSHEER KHAN @ BADSHAH KHAN vs STATE OF M.P. · Niyam