Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-01-06

Harinarayan G Bajaj vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2010 SC 69
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Harinarayan G Bajaj
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra & Ors
Author
V.S. Sirpurkar
Bench
Mukundakam Sharma, V.S. Sirpurkar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, particularly Sub-Section (4), regarding the addition of a co-accused in ongoing proceedings. The Court held that the Trial Court has the discretion to allow the addition of a co-accused at any stage of the trial, provided it is just and proper to do so. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the order splitting the trial, emphasizing the need for a unified trial for all accused under Sections 406 and 409 IPC.

Harinarayan G Bajaj vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors · Niyam