Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-01-05

Sree Swayam Prakash Ashramam & Anr vs G.Anandavally Amma & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2010 SUPREME COURT 622
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sree Swayam Prakash Ashramam & Anr
Respondent
G.Anandavally Amma & Ors
Author
Tarun Chatterjee
Bench
V.S.Sirpurkar, Tarun Chatterjee

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's affirmation of the lower courts' findings regarding the declaration of easement rights over the `B' Schedule property, which serves as a pathway to the `A' Schedule property. The Court emphasized that the original plaintiff had established continuous use of the pathway as an easement right, which was granted by the previous owner, Yogini Amma. The Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff's legal representatives, confirming their entitlement to the easement and restraining the defendants from obstructing access to the pathway.

Sree Swayam Prakash Ashramam & Anr vs G.Anandavally Amma & Ors · Niyam