Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-01-07

Daya Singh & Anr vs Gurdev Singh(Dead) By Lrs. & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2010 SUPREME COURT 3240
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Daya Singh & Anr
Respondent
Gurdev Singh(Dead) By Lrs. & Ors
Author
Tarun Chatterjee
Bench
Aftab Alam, Tarun Chatterjee

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Punjab and Haryana High Court's dismissal of the appellants' second appeal, affirming that their suit for declaration and injunction was barred by limitation under Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963, as it was filed 18 years after the alleged compromise. The Court emphasized that the cause of action arose at the time of the compromise in 1972, and the appellants failed to initiate their suit within the three-year limitation period. Consequently, the Court affirmed the lower court's ruling, reinforcing the importance of adhering to statutory limitation periods in civil suits.

Daya Singh & Anr vs Gurdev Singh(Dead) By Lrs. & Ors · Niyam