SHILPA AGGARWAL vs AVIRAL MITTAL

The Supreme Court directed the Respondent-husband to provide initial expenses for the Appellant-wife and her minor child to travel and stay in the UK for legal proceedings, emphasizing compliance with the High Court's order. The Court found the Respondent's initial proposal inadequate and required a detailed plan for travel and accommodation. The Appellant agreed to stay with the Respondent under certain conditions, including his psychiatric evaluation, and sought additional financial support for various expenses, which the Court considered for further orders.