Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-02-01

Rakhi Ray & Ors vs High Court Of Delhi & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2010 SUPREME COURT 932
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Rakhi Ray & Ors
Respondent
High Court Of Delhi & Ors
Author
B.S. Chauhan
Bench
K.G. Balakrishnan, Deepak Verma, B.S. Chauhan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Delhi High Court failed to consider anticipated vacancies while conducting the selection process for District Judges, as mandated by the judgment in Malik Mazhar Sultan v. U.P. Public Service Commission (2007) 2 SCALE 159. The Court emphasized that the selection list should be utilized to fill vacancies that arise after the advertisement, including those anticipated due to retirements and other factors. Consequently, the Court directed the respondents to offer appointments to the appellants from the select list, thereby ensuring adherence to the principles established in the earlier case.

Rakhi Ray & Ors vs High Court Of Delhi & Ors · Niyam