Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-02-02

State Of U.P. & Ors vs Saroj Kumar Sinha

Citation / case number
AIR 2010 SUPREME COURT 3131
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of U.P. & Ors
Respondent
Saroj Kumar Sinha
Author
Surinder Singh Nijjar
Bench
Surinder Singh Nijjar, V.S. Sirpurkar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the removal order of the respondent under the U.P. Government Servant (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1999, emphasizing the mandatory procedural requirements outlined in Rule 7 for conducting disciplinary inquiries. The Court found that the charge sheet did not comply with the necessary specifications, including clarity and the provision of evidence, thus violating the respondent's right to a fair hearing. Consequently, the Court directed the reinstatement of the respondent with all consequential benefits.

State Of U.P. & Ors vs Saroj Kumar Sinha · Niyam