Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-02-16

Santuram Yadav & Anr vs Sec.,Krishi Upaj M.S.Bemetara & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2010 SUPREME COURT 1615
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Santuram Yadav & Anr
Respondent
Sec.,Krishi Upaj M.S.Bemetara & Anr
Author
P. Sathasivam
Bench
R.M. Lodha, P. Sathasivam

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the dismissal of the appellants, who were employed on a daily wage basis, was improper as they were not given due consideration regarding their continuous service under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Court emphasized that the appellants had sufficient documentation to prove their employment duration, which was not adequately presented before the Labour Court. Consequently, the Court directed that the additional documents be considered to ensure substantial justice, thereby allowing the appeals and setting aside the High Court's dismissal of the writ petition.

Santuram Yadav & Anr vs Sec.,Krishi Upaj M.S.Bemetara & Anr · Niyam