Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-12-14

GEETA vs STATE OF U.P. .

Citation / case number
SC 2010/28103
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GEETA
Respondent
STATE OF U.P. .
Author
GANGULY
Bench
G.S. SINGHVI,ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Laws (Amendment) Act, 2007, affirming that the District Magistrate acted within his powers under Section 9(2) of the Amendment Act when nominating a new Pramukh following a no-confidence motion. The Court clarified that the senior Up-Pramukh is the only authorized person to act as Pramukh in the absence of a duly elected Pramukh, thereby dismissing the appeals against the High Court's decision. The judgment reinforces the legal framework governing Panchayat elections and the authority of the District Magistrate in such matters.

GEETA vs STATE OF U.P. . · Niyam