Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-12-16

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CHENNAI vs TULSYAN NEC LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2009/27021
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CHENNAI
Respondent
TULSYAN NEC LTD.
Author
S.H. KAPADIA,K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN,SWATANTER KUMAR, ,
Bench
S.H. KAPADIA,K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN,SWATANTER KUMAR, ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) credit under Section 115JAA of the Income Tax Act should be set off against the tax payable before calculating the tax liability. The Court held that MAT credit is to be set off against the tax payable, thereby establishing that the tax liability must be computed after considering the MAT credit. This ruling clarifies the interpretation of Section 115JAA, ensuring that taxpayers can benefit from the MAT credit in their tax calculations.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CHENNAI vs TULSYAN NEC LTD. · Niyam