Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-12-15

KOOTHA PERUMAL vs STATE TR.INSP.OF POLICE VIG.& ANTI CORPN

Citation / case number
SC 2008/8132
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KOOTHA PERUMAL
Respondent
STATE TR.INSP.OF POLICE VIG.& ANTI CORPN
Author
SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR
Bench
B. SUDERSHAN REDDY,SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant under Section 7 and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, affirming the High Court's decision. The Court established that the demand for a bribe by a public servant constitutes a clear violation of the Act, and the evidence presented, including the complainant's testimony and the trap laid by the Anti-Corruption Bureau, was sufficient to sustain the conviction. The appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment and fines for his corrupt practices.

KOOTHA PERUMAL vs STATE TR.INSP.OF POLICE VIG.& ANTI CORPN · Niyam