Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-12-15

PARLE BISLERI PVT. LTD. vs COMMR.OF CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EX.,AHMEDABAD

Citation / case number
SC 2006/1535
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PARLE BISLERI PVT. LTD.
Respondent
COMMR.OF CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EX.,AHMEDABAD
Author
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
Bench
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA,ANIL R. DAVE, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal by M/s Parle Bisleri Pvt. Ltd against the CESTAT's order which partly allowed the Revenue's claim regarding the applicability of Notifications 175/86 and 1/93. The Court held that the clearances of the appellant must be aggregated with those of M/s PEL and M/s PIL, as they were effectively one entity, thus disqualifying the appellant from the benefits of the notifications. The Court affirmed the CESTAT's decision, emphasizing the importance of accurate assessment and compliance with excise duty regulations.

PARLE BISLERI PVT. LTD. vs COMMR.OF CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EX.,AHMEDABAD · Niyam