Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-12-10

COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH vs M/S. PEPSI FOODS LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2003/993
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH
Respondent
M/S. PEPSI FOODS LTD.
Author
GANGULY
Bench
D.K. JAIN,ASOK KUMAR GANGULY,H.L. DATTU, ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled on the interpretation of Section 4(4)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, clarifying that the place of removal for excise duty purposes is the manufacturer's factory, not the depot of a related person. The Court held that the Revenue's insistence on considering the depot as the place of removal was incorrect, as the sale to the related person occurred at the factory gate. Consequently, the Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, allowing the appeal and dismissing the Revenue's demand for additional duty.

COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH vs M/S. PEPSI FOODS LTD. · Niyam