Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-12-16

SUBHASH CHAND vs STATE OF HARYANA .

Citation / case number
SC 2002/12799
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUBHASH CHAND
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA .
Author
A. K. PATNAIK
Bench
R.V. RAVEENDRAN,A.K. PATNAIK, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, affirming that the application for recovery of rent and ejectment filed under Section 77(3) of the Punjab Tenancy Act does not require notice in Form 'N' as mandated by the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953. The Court clarified that the Assistant Collector's finding regarding the non-maintainability of the application due to lack of notice was incorrect, as the proceedings were governed by the Tenancy Act. The appeal was dismissed, and the order of the High Court was upheld, confirming the legal position regarding tenant rights and procedural requirements.

SUBHASH CHAND vs STATE OF HARYANA . · Niyam