Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-12-03

State Of U.P. & Ors vs Hirendra Pal Singh Etc

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2010 SC 446
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of U.P. & Ors
Respondent
Hirendra Pal Singh Etc
Author
B.S. Chauhan
Bench
B.S. Chauhan, Deepak Verma, J.M. Panchal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals against interim orders of the Allahabad High Court that stayed amendments to the U.P. Legal Remembrancer Manual, specifically reducing the retirement age of District Government Counsel from 62 to 60 years and dispensing with consultation with the District Judge. The Court held that the amendments were within the State's legislative competence and that the High Court's interim orders were inappropriate as they effectively reinstated non-existent provisions. The Court emphasized that judicial intervention in policy decisions of the State should be limited unless the law is patently unconstitutional, thereby allowing the amendments to stand.

State Of U.P. & Ors vs Hirendra Pal Singh Etc · Niyam