Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-12-09

State Of H.P vs Nishant Sareen

Citation / case number
AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 404
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of H.P
Respondent
Nishant Sareen
Author
R.M. Lodha
Bench
R.M. Lodha, Aftab Alam

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the extent of the government's power under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, regarding the sanction to prosecute public servants. The Court held that the competent authority has the discretion to review its earlier decision on sanction, as demonstrated in the case of Nishant Sareen, where the initial refusal was overturned upon reconsideration of evidence. The Court emphasized that the authority must evaluate the evidence of misconduct thoroughly before granting or refusing sanction, thereby establishing the principle that a reconsideration of facts can lead to a different conclusion on prosecution sanction.

State Of H.P vs Nishant Sareen · Niyam