Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-12-02

Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 312
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra And Ors
Author
Dalveer Bhandari
Bench
Dalveer Bhandari, K.S. Panicker Radhakrishnan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court emphasized the balance between individual liberty and societal interest in bail matters, referencing Sections 436 to 450 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Court held that the order of bail must reflect this balance, considering the presumption of innocence and the potential risk to society from the accused. The appeal was decided in favor of maintaining this balance, underscoring the importance of personal liberty while addressing public safety concerns.

Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors · Niyam