Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-12-01

Inst.Of Chartered Accountants Of India vs Vimal Kumar Surana & Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Inst.Of Chartered Accountants Of India
Respondent
Vimal Kumar Surana & Anr
Author
G.S. Singhvi
Bench
G.S. Singhvi, Asok Kumar Ganguly

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed whether Sections 24, 24A, and 26 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 bar prosecution under other laws, including the IPC. The Court held that these provisions do not preclude criminal liability for impersonation and fraud, affirming that a person can be prosecuted under Sections 419, 420, 468, and 472 IPC for misrepresenting themselves as a Chartered Accountant. The outcome was that the charges against Vimal Kumar Surana were upheld, allowing the prosecution to proceed.

Inst.Of Chartered Accountants Of India vs Vimal Kumar Surana & Anr · Niyam