Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-08-09

TATA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL WORKERS UNION vs TATA MEMPORIAL CENTRE

Citation / case number
SC 2009/8586
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
TATA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL WORKERS UNION
Respondent
TATA MEMPORIAL CENTRE
Author
ALTAMAS KABIR,CYRIAC JOSEPH,H.L. GOKHALE, ,
Bench
ALTAMAS KABIR,CYRIAC JOSEPH,H.L. GOKHALE, ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court's ruling that the Central Government is the 'appropriate government' under Section 2(3) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, in conjunction with Section 2(a) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Court found that the applications filed under the MRTU and PULP Act by the second respondent were non-maintainable, thereby affirming the denial of the appellant's status as the recognized union. This decision emphasizes the jurisdictional authority of the Central Government over the matter, impacting the rights of the trade union and its members.

TATA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL WORKERS UNION vs TATA MEMPORIAL CENTRE · Niyam