Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-08-12

M.A.A.ANNAMALAI vs STATE OF KARNATAKA

Citation / case number
SC 2008/22173
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.A.A.ANNAMALAI
Respondent
STATE OF KARNATAKA
Author
Dalveer Bhandari
Bench
DALVEER BHANDARI,A.K. PATNAIK, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the appellant, having resigned as a Director of R.P.S. Benefit Fund Ltd. effective 27.12.1997, could not be held liable for the alleged offences under Section 420 IPC and the Money Circulation and Banning Act, 1978, which occurred after his resignation. The Court emphasized that the material ingredients of cheating were not established against the appellant, and thus the proceedings against him were quashed. The judgment of the Karnataka High Court was upheld, affirming that the appellant was not responsible for the company's actions post-resignation.

M.A.A.ANNAMALAI vs STATE OF KARNATAKA · Niyam