Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-08-27

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs ARUN GULAB GAWALI .

Citation / case number
SC 2006/20477
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Respondent
ARUN GULAB GAWALI .
Author
B.S. CHAUHAN
Bench
P. SATHASIVAM,B.S. CHAUHAN, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the FIR registered under Sections 384, 386, 506(ii), 120, and 34 of the IPC, ruling that the complainant, Mohd. Qureshi, had retracted his complaint and expressed a desire not to proceed with the case. The Court emphasized that the consent of the complainant is crucial in criminal proceedings, particularly in cases involving extortion. The judgment reinforced the principle that a victim's unwillingness to pursue charges can lead to the dismissal of the case.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs ARUN GULAB GAWALI . · Niyam