Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-08-30

SUDAM SHANKAR KSHIRSAGAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .

Citation / case number
SC 2002/8550
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUDAM SHANKAR KSHIRSAGAR
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .
Author
Mukundakam Sharma
Bench
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA,ANIL R. DAVE, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court's decision regarding the interpretation of 'holding' under Section 2(8) of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986, affirming that a Hindu Joint Family qualifies as a 'person' under the Act. The Court ruled that the land acquisition proceedings against the appellants were valid, as the entire joint family holding must be considered as one unit for the purpose of land acquisition. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the legality of the notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act.

SUDAM SHANKAR KSHIRSAGAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . · Niyam