Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-08-05

State Of Punjab vs Pappu @ Balwinder Singh & Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Punjab
Respondent
Pappu @ Balwinder Singh & Ors
Bench
Harjit Singh Bedi, Chandramauli Kr. Prasad

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the evidence presented, particularly medical evidence, did not substantiate a charge under Section 302 IPC, concluding that the case fell under Section 304 Part II IPC instead. The Court noted that the respondents had already served six years in jail and that a normal sentence for Section 304 Part II would be approximately five years, rendering further examination of the merits unnecessary. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed.

State Of Punjab vs Pappu @ Balwinder Singh & Ors · Niyam