Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-04-01

Mysore Urban Dev.Authority By Its Comm vs Veer Kumar Jain & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2010 SUPREME COURT 2153
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Mysore Urban Dev.Authority By Its Comm
Respondent
Veer Kumar Jain & Ors
Bench
R.M. Lodha, R.V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of the withdrawal notification dated 22.7.2002 under Section 21 of the Karnataka General Clauses Act, which rescinded an earlier notification under Section 48(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court held that a notification under Section 48(1) creates a valuable right for landowners, and thus, cannot be withdrawn without a hearing. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the withdrawal notification, emphasizing the necessity of hearing affected parties before such actions are taken.

Mysore Urban Dev.Authority By Its Comm vs Veer Kumar Jain & Ors · Niyam