Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-04-26

Sr.Suptd.Telegraph(Traffic)Bhopal vs Santosh Kumar Seal And Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2010 SUPREME COURT 2140
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sr.Suptd.Telegraph(Traffic)Bhopal
Respondent
Santosh Kumar Seal And Ors
Author
R.M. Lodha
Bench
R. M. Lodha, R. V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal's award directing the reinstatement of workmen and payment of back wages, finding that their termination violated Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Court rejected the appellant's argument that the workmen abandoned their jobs, emphasizing that the plea regarding the establishment not being an 'industry' was not raised before the Tribunal or the High Court. The Court affirmed the Tribunal's findings and dismissed the appeal, thereby reinforcing the legal principle that mandatory provisions for retrenchment must be followed.

Sr.Suptd.Telegraph(Traffic)Bhopal vs Santosh Kumar Seal And Ors · Niyam