Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-09-10

ANIL CHANDRA vs RADHA KRISHNA GAUR .

Citation / case number
SC 2008/9659
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ANIL CHANDRA
Respondent
RADHA KRISHNA GAUR .
Author
TARUN CHATERJEE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of the U.P. Government Servants Seniority (3rd Amendment) Rules, 2007, which aimed to alter the seniority of government servants based on caste reservations. The Court held that the seniority of employees prior to the enforcement of these rules should remain undisturbed, affirming the applicability of the U.P. Jal Nigam (Public Health Branch) Service Regulations, 1978, and the Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes and other Backward Classes) Act, 1994. The Court emphasized that the provisions of Article 16(4-A) of the Constitution, allowing for reservation in promotions, must be interpreted in light of the precedent set in Indira Sawhney vs. Union of India, which limited such reservations.

ANIL CHANDRA vs RADHA KRISHNA GAUR . · Niyam