Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-09-02

SANTOSHKUMAR SHIVGONDA PATIL vs BALASAHEB TUKARAM SHEVALE .

Citation / case number
SC 2004/21620
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SANTOSHKUMAR SHIVGONDA PATIL
Respondent
BALASAHEB TUKARAM SHEVALE .
Author
R.M. LODHA TARUN CHATTERJEE
Bench
R.M. LODHA TARUN CHATTERJEE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the powers conferred under Section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, which allows the State Government and certain Revenue Officers to revise decisions made by subordinate officers without a fixed time limit. The Court held that the absence of a time limit does not imply that the power can be exercised indefinitely, emphasizing the need for reasonable exercise of such powers. The Court ultimately upheld the decisions of the lower authorities regarding the unauthorized entries made in favor of Shivgonda Satgonda Patil, affirming the legality of the order granting 1/4th share to Tukaram Shevale.

SANTOSHKUMAR SHIVGONDA PATIL vs BALASAHEB TUKARAM SHEVALE . · Niyam